The results of tests are estimated which prepare the project of conclusion about the degree of expressed of the estimated personality-business qualities. The same preliminary individual estimation is conducted by specialists, processing the results of the special exercises. For the increase of objectivity it is expedient to bring over to work simultaneously of a few specialists and then compare the got results.

Results of group exercises originally in the groups of and observers, which the results of diagnostics, specify information, formulate hypotheses about the degree of of the estimated qualities.

A final discussion is procedure of taking of results of estimation on different procedures — usually conducted in form group exchange opinions. Possibility to confront displays estimated the same qualities appears during such general discussion, rotined in different procedures, to check up hypotheses, formed private specialists, come to the final decision about that, how the level of development of qualities can be appraised examinee, that can promote or hinder his effective work, to say of supposition about the prospects of growth and preferred areas of activity of employee.

1. General conclusion on a concrete participant TSO (on a scale).

2. Description of weak and strong sides of participant.

3. Suggestion on development of qualities and working off skills, and also suggestion in connection with advancement.

4. Section with recommendations in regard to the acquaintance of participant with TSO (can absent).

I. General conclusion:

(1.1) what was seemed by a participant to beginning of estimation

(1.2) as showed oneself in practice

(1.3) what produced the impression

(1.4) other information (age, capabilities, tendencies, partial former job performances)

(1.5) description of qualities, capabilities, inherent or failings a participant as leader

(1.6) description of participant in the process of implementation of separate , analysis of conduct from point of qualities, necessary a leader:

• capacity for leadership

• ability to socialize with the people of interrelation in a group

• style of intercourse in spare from work time (in interruptions) handwriting

• etc

2. Description of strong and weak sides of participant TSO

(2.1) enumeration

(2.2) general supervisions:

general impression

oratorical art

capacity for commerce

sensitiveness

purposefulness

capacity for critical judgements

capacity for planning and organization...

3. Suggestions on results TSO about possibility of advancement:

(3.1) suggestions about that needs to be undertaken personally to the participant for overcoming of failings

(3.2) to recommendation leaders, what work a participant can be at.