In accordance with procedures ODI is broken up on four phase. On the first phases a playing collective carries out the analysis of the systems of situation, trying to go out on the chart of enterprise in his varied functional relationships with the external systems. The most essential for an enterprise aspects of situation come into question on the second and third phases of game, on fourth phases is a theme, related to the economic and economic policy of future leader of enterprise.

Organizationally the participants of ODI are broken up on three group: 1) group of applicants (broken up on sub-groups); 2) group of experts and 3) workinggroup with the function of expert estimation.

On every phase for 2 — 3 hour taken on work in sub-groups, the general meeting on which every sub-group does 5 — 10-minute lecture is after conducted. On every lecture a discussion is developed. Procedure (1 hour) is a reflection analysis of situation, I.e. analysis that takes place on a game, analysis of appearance of group and actions of every player, programming of works on a next phase.

After completion ODI begins «pre-election », in the process of which come forward with the programs in different services and subdivisions of enterprise. This stage is completed the final choice of candidate on vacant position.

Dignity of ODI is a decision of tasks taking into account the real enterprises:

• forming of strategy of development of enterprise (without new own strategy, changing of becomes senseless);

• exposure of basic production problems of enterprise;

• forming of the consolidated groups and collectives into an organizational-administrative structure, which will realize new strategies of development of enterprise.

Lacks of ODI are psychological inflexibility of procedure of competition, when «overboard» quite often there are applicants, not maintaining the mental work strained beyond measure and requiring the special psychological help and support. In addition, ODI is built on principle of dicking of old organizational structure through intentional provocation of conflict. In the conditions of social instability this reception can work against the organizers of competition.